✍️✍️✍️ Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water

Wednesday, December 01, 2021 3:39:07 AM

Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water



Oh brave new world quote to Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water King. It can also trick you into early Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water marriage which may end disastrously. They reported that he appeared to be acting in a relaxed Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water and did not appear to be under Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water stress. But the victims those living who lost loved ones know he'll soon be gone, and he'll be remembered as a criminal Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water, unfortunately, nothing will bring back those he murdered--if hurting him more would do that, I'd be in favor. September Gardens in the Dune and Oil. They are also loyal friends, the negative side of Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water faithfulness being clannishness, the narrow patriotism of "my country right or wrong"; and closing ranks in suspicion and coldness toward outsiders.

What you need to know about Joyce Carol Oates

To put it another way, what was the last generation that actually could write? Once we figure that out, let's just teach 'em today how we taught 'em then. I was watching Blue Velvet on the Independent Film Channel and noticed when I pressed the information button that the film got two stars. Blue Velvet? The film that won a bunch of awards from critics and at festivals? That was nominated for an Oscar? The film that regularly appears on polls for top ten flms of the 80s, and greatest films of all time? It may not be perfect, but three stars at least. I have a conservative friend who calls the Democrats shameless. For what? For whatever they're doing at the time. Lately, he's got a lot of his plate. For example, he complains about the investigation into CIA interrogation techniques.

He feels there's no need for a special investigation, of course, but also has a list of other things they could investigate, such as prominent Democrats who broke the law but were given a clean bill of health Al Gore, Chris Dodd, Bill Richardson, Charles Rangel , the New Black Panthers who were already guilty of voter intimidation in a default judgment when the case was dropped and even those in the CIA who leaked classified information, which was an unambiguous case of breaking the law, but somehow doesn't interest the Department of Justice.

He also claims--and I agree--that selected members of Congress were fully briefed on CIA techniques and now that the winds are blowing the other way, claim they had no idea what was going on. Also, there's Obamacare. Ted Kennedy wasn't even cold before they started exploiting his death and calling it Kennedycare. Then there's the replacement of Kennedy. In , when Mitt Romney was running the state, Massachusetts changed the rules so that the governor couldn't appoint a temporary senator before the special election. Now with a Democrat in charge, they want to change the rules back. I admit the last one is pretty blatant.

However, hypocrisy is simply the coin of the realm in politics. If you disagree with a policy, fine, debate it. But if all you've got is a charge of hypocrisy, it's so common it's hardly worth noting. And even if you do note it, it's almost guaranteed those on the other side won't be able to see it. She takes feminists to task for their attitude toward motherhood and they respond she's mistaken, or she misunderstands them : There is an opium-den quality to maternity leave. The high of a love that obliterates everything. A need so consuming that it is threatening to everything you are and care about.

Where did your day go? Did you stare blankly at the baby for hours? And was that staring blankly more fiercely pleasurable, more compelling than nearly anything you have ever done? One of the minor dishonesties of the feminist movement has been to underestimate the passion of this time, to try for a rational, politically expedient assessment. Historically, feminists have emphasized the difficulty, the drudgery of new motherhood. They have tried to analogize childcare to the work of men; and so for a long time, women have called motherhood a "vocation. Some of the pressing tasks I do—say, running to the drugstore to buy more pacifiers—are just excuses to think about the baby, to obsess and dwell upon every little thing about him. Here again is the singular fixation that characterizes addiction rather than calm productivity.

I have no dog in this fight. Though it is interesting, for all the obliterative love, and the singular fixation, that she still has the time to write essays philosophizing on life issues. Later, I saw them in Stella , which I was surprised to find I enjoyed. The format is not promising. They play two performers named Michael Ian Black and Michael Showalter who are very taken with themselves. They star in a sketch comedy show and their arrogance and obliviousness cause a lot of pain to themselves and those around them.

We get to see some of the sketches from their show-within-a-show. This is tricky, doing comedy within comedy, yet the sketches themselves aren't bad. The main comic focus, though, is on their behind-the-scenes lives. I've watched the first few episodes and, like Stella , I'm a bit surprised to say it's pretty good. I was hoping no one would bring up Chappaquiddick, but it was inevitable. A number of blogs and plenty of commenters attacked Ted Kennedy for what he did. Seems to me the last 24 hours were a good time to lay off this subject. What interests me more, in a man bites dog sort of way, is some of his defenders brought it up.

I guess the best defense is a good offense. For instance, we have Joyce Carol Oates in The Guardian : Yet if one weighs the life of a single young woman against the accomplishments of the man President Obama has called the greatest Democratic senator in history, what is one to think? The poet John Berryman once wondered: "Is wickedness soluble in art? One might rephrase, in a vocabulary more suitable for our politicized era: "Is wickedness soluble in good deeds? Fidelity to a personal code of morality would seem to fade in significance as the public sphere, like an enormous sun, blinds us to all else.

There are a lot of things you could say, but I'll try to keep it short. In general, I agree that the personal morality of a politician or a novelist, for that matter doesn't really matter. Not to me, anyway. Politicians are hired hands, and while it might be better if they had sterling personal lives, what I care about, ultimately, is what they do in their professional capacity. I'm not voting them in to reward them for their virtue, and I see very little correlation between personal goodness and good politics. But how far does this sentiment go? Would it be okay if I found out a politician was a serial rapist? And what if his badness is more closely related to his politics--say, he blackmails other politicians so they'll vote his way.

I obviously don't approve of the means, but do the ends make me vote for him rather than his nicer opponent who votes the wrong way, or is ineffective? Does greatness excuse everything? Does size excuse smaller problems? More troublesome, it's easy to take Oates in a more partisan manner. It's easy to read her as saying as long as you're a powerful politicians Oates approves of, you can do whatever you want. I guess just having the right politics in general will get you off for minor peccadilloes.

Then there's the corollary--even if you're wonderful to your family and friends, if you vote for bad things, like wars Oates doesn't support, you're a bad person. I have less to say about Melissa Lafsky in the Huffington Post : Mary Jo [Kopechne] wasn't a right-wing talking point or a negative campaign slogan. She was a dedicated civil rights activist and political talent with a bright future [ We don't know how much Kennedy was affected by her death, or what she'd have thought about arguably being a catalyst for the most successful Senate career in history. Actually, I have nothing to say. Though the film adaptation of this Broadway hit leaves something to be desired, I understand why they open with Ann-Marget. The official leads may be Dick Van Dyke reprising his stage role and Janet Leigh not nearly as convincing a Latina as Chita Rivera , but why would they hold off on Hollywood latest and greatest sex kitten?

The song was written for the movie, and fits quite well into the score. It helps that Adams and Strouse, the original composers, created it. Greek tragedy still speaks to us because it deals with basic human themes. Directors and critics, however, often want to add a layer of modernity to these pieces, believing they have to "improve" them to make them relevant. Sometimes this adds something, sometimes it takes something away. She has trouble with the casting of Dionysus. Since helmer Akalaitis obviously intended the amoral god of licentiousness to be portrayed as a petulant youth with curly locks and torn jeans, it might be argued that [Jonathan] Groff "Spring Awakening," "Hair" is only doing his job. But even in this context, he doesn't muster the ferocious anger Dionysus turns on the leaders of Thebes for rejecting his claims to divinity and banning his dangerous new religion.

Nor is he particularly believable as an Olympian stud capable of driving masses of women into a state of violent sexual frenzy just by breathing into his microphone. But that's the whole point. Dionysus is not one of those old gods that Pentheus might respect. He's this new guy, with a new style--almost epicene--who comes on the scene and demands, shockingly, that everyone worship him. He's supposed to seem out of place. If he seems scary and ferocious, as you'd expect, then it's not as big a deal. In fact, this is a theatrical trick that Euripidies used over and over. Look at how sympathetic he makes Medea before she starts doing horrible things. As for driving women into a sexual frenzy, how many times in the 20th century and earlier did some new force appear Rudolph Valentino, The Beatles, Leonardo DiCaprio who drove women crazy and had the establishment shaking their heads at how wimpy these new sex symbols are?

Stasio also has her reading of Agave: As the cursed Agave, Joan MacIntosh singlehandedly delivers Euripides' other significant theme in this tragedy -- the terrible consequences when women are consistently thwarted from pursuing their natural skills and ambitions. MacIntosh gives a luminous portrayal of Agave expressing her pride and joy at succeeding in the masculine role of a hunter, the height of her exaltation making it all the more tragic when Agave comes to her senses and realizes she has killed her own son.

I suppose the play could support this reading if you insist, but Agave killing her son is horrifying, and it's a bit of a stretch to say we were supposed to be happy about her successful hunting up to that point. A better reading might be this shows how we should be wary of the powers the gods can unleash, as well as the dangers women represent if they're not properly controlled.

Ellie Greenwich, one of the top songwriters of the s, has died. She often wrote with her husband, Jeff Barry and also worked with Phil Spector a fair amount. Her songs were probably the best at capturing the spirit of the girl groups. Like so many other great Brill Building songwriters, her name might not be that well known, but her songs sure are. What songs? I was walking down Hollywood Boulevard about six hours ago when I noticed a huge crowd ahead. Worse, the sidewalk was closed. Since this was in front of the Chinese Theatre, I figured there's either some new footprints being set or it's a premiere. It was the latter. I got to the other side of the road where even more were gathered, but at least I could walk and saw it was for All About Steve , the latest Sandra Bullock comedy.

Every time someone came out of a limousine, people would scream. I didn't notice if Sandra or her costars were there yet as I moved along. I don't think I'm jaded by having seen so many celebrities on the streets of LA, but really, is standing around just waiting to see them walk into a movie theatre such a big thrill? Maureen Tucker turns 65 today. Happy birthday, Mo! While I expected the decision to send the Lockerbie Bomber back home to die to be unpopular, I'm a little surprised at how overwhelming the opposition and outrage has been.

Here's a pretty strong official example from the FBI director. It makes one wonder if the damage will spread. Will any politicians be voted out? Will this hurt Scotland's relations with America, and the world? Will this even hurt Libya's standing in the word? Will people wonder if Britain, or even the U. I see this as a mostly symbolic fight which lends itself to posturing , but that doesn't mean there won't be ramifications. Saw Cold Souls , a metaphysical comedy that didn't really work.

It stars Paul Giamatti, playing Paul Giamatti, who has his soul removed so he can get on with his life. But it's never really worked out properly just what the soul does and doesn't do and there's an escape clause where the soul-removing technique leaves a bit of the soul behind. I realize we're talking about huge philosophical questions, but the movie has to work on a surface level no matter how absurd before we can get to them. I was, however, reminded of a thought experiment from Raymond Smullyan.

He said imagine you feel so bad you want to kill yourself, but you don't want to cause any pain to your family or friends. So you got to an establishment that sells you a pill that destroys your soul--you'll feel nothing inside--but on the outside, you do everything you'd do otherwise so no one can tell. So you take the pill just before you go to bed. What's the first thing you do when you wake up? You go back to that establishment and complain that the pill did nothing. Lost has so many characters that you never know if you favorite will appear any given week.

So it was interesting to see how many episodes each character has appeared in over the first five seasons. The names are obvious, but I wouldn't necessarily have guessed this order: 1. Jack - 96 2. Kate - 94 3. Sawyer - 92 4. Hurley - 91 5. Locke - 85 that'll teach him to move away from the group 6. Sayid - 83 7. Jin - 78 didn't look like he'd beat Sun not that long ago 8.

Sun - 76 9. Charlie - 61 Claire - 59 Wonder if Ben or Juliet will make the top ten by the time the show ends. Some other interesting data: Boone, with 25 appearances, beats Eko, Faraday, Ana Lucia and Miles, who all have 21 though that may change. Bernard beats Rose 22 to Most popular non-starring "Other"--Richard, whose 20 beats Tom's 19 and Alex's Most popular DI member not counting Ben is easily Pierre Chang, though that includes a lot of video appearances where he didn't even use his real name. Charles Widmore has appeared 13 times while his daughter has only been seen Of the unaffiliated non-regulars, Rousseau played by two people is easily the most popular, with 22 appearances, while Christian Shepherd is second with Will that change?

Not that many characters have appeared in all five seasons, but Nadia has--she's in five episodes, one a season. Attorney General Eric Holder has decided to appoint an investigator to look into CIA interrogations of terror suspects. I have no idea what the investigator will conclude, but I can guess how it'll play politically. There are two ways to do this. It can be done quickly, furtively and in a partisan manner. Or it can be done proudly, openly and with everyone given a chance to explain themselves. If it's done the first way, the White House will get away without too much damage. If it's done the second, this could truly hurt them.

PS Here's a sentence in the Washington Post story I linked: During the Bush years, a team of more than a half-dozen career prosecutors in the Eastern District of Virginia, which is renown for its expertise in probing clandestine operations, reviewed about 20 cases of alleged prisoner abuse after receiving referrals from the military and then-CIA Inspector General John Helgerson. Nurse Jackie 's first season is over and it wasn't much. Most of the show is Jackie at the hospital, with drama we've seen done better, comedy that doesn't quite work, and characters who rarely rise above cliche.

Meanwhile, the whole Jackie's secret-marriage thing has been a non-starter. I admit it was interesting to see Jackie and pharmacist Eddie getting it on ten years after the same actors flirted as mob wife and priest. But the only character I thought really worked was newbie nurse Zoey Barkow, played by Merritt Wever. The other parts are just a collection of quirks, while Zoey actually felt alive. The show's been picked up.

Will it get better in its second season? It just about has to. I'm always glad to salute any sister sites that have adopted our clown-like look. The reason we chose it for Pajama Guy should be clear from our name, but when others choose it, it's usually a sign of bravery. Happy birthday, Leonard Bernstein. I was looking for a decent version of what I think is his most beautiful song, "Some Other Time," but I couldn't find one, so her are some "up" numbers instead, in chronological order. A while ago I noted when Simon Cowell used the British phrase "chalk and cheese" on American Idol , his cohorts treated him like he had brain damage. That can happen when people hear an odd phrase they're unaware of. But there's an opposite phenomenon.

I once said "the proof is in the pudding" which originally was "the proof of the pudding is in the eating," and is used here and in Britain and a friend who heard it thought I got it from the South, where she was raised. Sometimes you figure something you hear as a kid is a local locution. This is from the transcript: Mr. I think it's a Southern expression. Sorry Loudon, this is a phrase used all across America--just not so much as it once was.

On the other hand, it is an American phrase, so if Ryan Seacrest uses it, Simon Cowell can raise an eyebrow. This is turning out to be the weakest season of Entourage so far. It's always been a fairly loose show, but the ups and downs of Vince's and Ari's career provided the backbone. This season, there's little movement on that front. In fact, Vince is grounded when his movie shoot is postponed. Ari's safely in charge of his successful agency.

Instead, it's all soap opera: Eric has trouble with his girlfriend, Turtle has trouble with his girlfriend, an agent in Ari's agency is having an affair with another agent. Worse, it's bad soap opera--we don't care about any of these stories. They're been renewed for another season. Time to figure out where they're going. I don't make fun of people who have a heavy foreign accent since all that tells me is they speak at least two languages. At the end of a career model I would like to start a family. My favorite historical figure is Cleopatra, because his charm and intelligence was able to great things. PS She's surprisingly unsure of her height. PPS Why was I checking out this page? Do I need to explain? Not being much of a tea or coffee drinker, I rarely find myself inside a Starbucks.

Nevertheless, the place must have been doing something right to have expanded so much until recently. So I'm always surprised at the vitriol it inspires. Is it such a bad place? Then why do people go? There are plenty of other coffee houses around with different "atmosphere," and presumably different prices and products. Is it just the reputation of Starbucks, and not Starbucks itself, that bothers people? The Coffee Bean is pretty big out here and I don't hear the same condemnation. I think the proper thought experiment is this: imagine the Starbucks corporation doesn't exist. No Starbucks anywhere.

Now imagine something exactly like a Starbucks opens just down the block. Would you think it's a pretty cool place, or would you reject it? Before I forget, loved last week's Mad Men. Looks like season 3 will maintain the high standard. I'm a bit surprised it's taking place in mid, since I thought the original idea was each season jumps ahead two years. I guess Matthew Weiner has more to say. Does this mean the show will go on indefinitely? Also, this solves the problems of how to deal with Don Draper's kids. The other question now is will Weiner go over well-trod ground, and use Kennedy's death? Cynthia Littleton in Variety puts it thus: We at home, of course, know that trauma that is lurking around the corner Dallas, the grassy knoll, a convertible limo -- you get the picture.

I guess it shows how successful the conspiracy mongers have been that the grassy knoll, which essentially has nothing to do with the actual event, is used to conjure up the assassination. It's weird to see a book you've known as long as you can remember come to life. The strangest part is hearing the voices out load. No matter how they do it, there's no way it'll match what you heard in your head. And I didn't hear Tony Soprano, that's for sure.

In a discussion of the Rock Band version of the Beatles recently published in The New York Times Magazine , we see this : Still, the overt selling point of Guitar Hero was less participatory music experience than rock-god fantasy. It leaned heavily on the over-the-top energy of heavy metal and punk, and came wrapped in a cartoonish aesthetic. The Replacements are a less aggressive musical act? Less aggressive than what? Leaf blowers? Paper shredders? Jet engines? Ever read something so weird you wonder if you dreamed it? Right off the bat, something felt off when I read this underneath the headline: W.

Like a guy with a million hands. Why would W. Field's have anything to say about Les Paul? More on that in a sec. In his garage studio on Curson Street, he worked in secrecy. Immersed in his work one day, however, he heard someone in his yard. It was W. He looked out and saw Groucho Marx. They might be interested in something like this. Once again, huh? Fields on a swing. There are a lot of things wrong with this picture, but the wrongest is that Fields died in At the very least, Payne's dates are way off--though I suspect the whole thing never happened. As for the next story, I've read everything could get my hands on about Groucho Marx and have never heard this one.

Okay, it's a Les Paul story, not a Groucho story. But once again, it's the s, which puts Groucho in his 60s, throwing rocks at a window. Alright, maybe that happened, but a Groucho with family who are engineers in Glendale? Who then manufactured a lathe for Paul? This is nutso. Groucho et al created gags, not gauges. Either someone was funning with Payne and he bought it, or Payne knew some actual anecdotes and replaced the real names with his favorite clowns. But why don't we get a true expert to tell us. What do you say, New England Guy, what's really going on? Happy birthday, Debbi! Years before, Brian Wilson wrote a beautiful but mopey song, "In My Room," about shutting out everything else and creating his own world. I like to think this is The Bangles' answer, breaking down the door and teaching him about other things he can do.

Some fun complaints about the design of Star Wars , and, if you go deep into the comments, some interesting rationales. I was always bothered by the giant worm on the barren asteroid, though someone came up with my explanation--the asteroid belt is part of a recently destroyed, mind-bogglingly gigantic planet. The worm was in its dying days, awoken from its stupor by blaster shots. I'd also like to know how the Dianoga--a fairly big and clearly organic monster-got to lurk in the Death Star's trash compactor. Did one of the consruction workers flush his baby Dianoga down the toilet? He's got terminal cancer, and his Scottish jailers have let him go home out of compassion.

His actions led to deaths. He'd served 8 years so far. He's received a hero's welcome in Tripoli sickening and still protests his innocence many people believe the CIA was behind the explosion. Whether or not he should be freed should make us ask why we incarcerate people to begin with. There are a number of reasons punishment, retribution, deterrence, incapacitation, moral lesson and obviously how you feel about them will determine how you feel about the actions of the Scottish authorities. I have no trouble with his release. I'm not saying justice demands it, but it seems to me that Scotland is just recognizing he's already got a death sentence, which is more important than where he serves it out.

I can't see him causing any more trouble. The main question is what effect will this have on deterrence for such criminals. I find it hard to believe that this act of lenience will give terrorists the green light--no one's going to think "hey, I can get out if I get so sick I'm gonna die. Some feel compassion is not only wasted on such a terrible villain, but is downright immoral. That it cheapens the act of compassion itself.

And that it spits in the eyes of the victims. But the victims those living who lost loved ones know he'll soon be gone, and he'll be remembered as a criminal and, unfortunately, nothing will bring back those he murdered--if hurting him more would do that, I'd be in favor. As for compassion, the quality of mercy is not strained. If we can afford it to the lowest and the worst of us, how much easier will it be when we try to help others.

And in doing such actions, we don't vindicate his evil, we separate ourselves from it. Here's an article that asks about Quentin Tarantino "Could it be that one of the most overrated directors of the '90s has become one of the most underrated of the aughts? He has shown a certain growth as director. Or perhaps I should say he's gotten better at spectacle. I suppose that comes with experience, and bigger budgets. But it also comes at the expense of a lot of other things--in particular, his earlier films, even with heightened dialogue, were still within the realm of human possibility. And his earlier films couldn't afford to be as self-indulgent. He seems to now be in a period where everything is bigger than life. I'm more interested in Tarantino the director as someone who fulfills the vision of Tarantino the writer, and if the vision is less interesting, who cares how accomplished the direction is?

His films haven't seen his latest are their own genre as much as people try to copy them --inspired by the exploitation genre, they're smart and talky in a way no one else is. The surface similarities aren't nearly as important as the differences; you could say the same for Death Proof versus Dirty Mary Crazy Larry. I wouldn't go so far to say he's got the Citizen Kane problem, but as of this date, he still seems to be chasing after the stunning one-two punch of Reservoir Dogs and Pulp Fiction.

Perhaps that's why he's moving away from that style. Or perhaps it's just a natural growth. Either way, he seems willing to do it his way no matter what the critics say. And as long as he makes money, I guess he'll keep doing it his way. Daniel Gross's argument in Slate about health care is so silly that I read it twice to make sure it wasn't a parody. He claims it's hypocritical for people to attack government-run health care while they're using government-run health care. Whether or not we have a good system, and whether or not the reform being bruited about these days would make it better is irrelevant.

The fact is, government is spending trillions on health care with the taxpayers, as always, picking up the tab. There's nothing hypocritical about using it as long as it's out there, even if you don't agree with how it's being run, or even if you want to get rid of it entirely. Closer to hypocrisy--but still not making the grade--would be people who pay little or no taxes voting for politicians who promise them huge benefits. In weird show biz news , Robert Zemeckis will be doing some sort of remake of Yellow Submarine. I like Zemeckis and love The Beatles, but it's unclear to me what this will be about.

It'll be in performance capture whose performance? It is clear that Zemeckis will have the rights to the songs in the original movie. My suggestion--toss out those crappy George Harrison numbers. Here's an odd line from the article: "The deal marries cutting-edge 3-D feature technology with a surging reinterest in The Beatles The Beatles, it goes without saying, were the top act of the 60s. But they've continued to be top-selling artists in the almost 40 years since they broke, even though they've only offered repackaging, outtakes, and a few new numbers. In the 18 years since SoundScan started tracking sales, they've been the 2 top selling artists , only behind Garth Brooks.

There's no need for a surge, they've always been big. I understand that there's a "man bites dog" aspect that led them to go deeper into this one than usual, but it really makes me wish they could present a coherent libertarian perspective on other issues. Particularly those where the editors don't so obviously agree with the conclusion. There's a local weekly that's so minor I won't bother to name it. The article puts it like this: [After noting that watching the protests, you might think health care is being rammed down the throats of unwiling voters, and that the town hall protestors are stirring people from their apathy. Only 34 percent of respondents in a recent Gallup Poll Aug. This argument is silly on its face.

Even if the protestors are turning people off, it doesn't mean their views are wrong or unpopular. But, in any case, the poll is being mischaracterized. So we've got this poll with what I'd call remarkable results--that the protestors are moving people against health care reform--and the author of the editorial uses it to claim the opposite. It's an old trick where you take the people in the middle and include them with the group you like. But I've rarely seen it done in such a blatantly dishonest manner. I was recently walking down Vine--the Walk Of Fame part--and saw a bunch of flowers set by a star. I looked down and saw it was "Michael Jackson. I laughed to myself. They got it wrong. Then I looked at the card on the flowers.

It was to Les Paul. Sure enough, on the other side, was the star for Les Paul and Mary Ford. Stephen Jay Gould wrote a famous article on the evolution of Mickey Mouse. The character's look became more childlike through the years. It made sense. But at least he stayed the same age. Then some time later, someone came up with Muppet Babies. The Muppets were already favorites with kids--was this necessary? Disney Princesses are already cute. This is overkill. I'm looking forward to Disney Princess Embryos. I just read Axel Madsen's authorized biography of William Wyler. Wyler was one of those "class" Hollywood directors who won a lot of awards and made well-respected, and often quite successful, films, but doesn't thrill me much.

Not that he didn't make a decent film now and then, but his are rarely the type I want to watch more than once. The bio shows how he worked his way up through the business, and goes into his many years as one of the most exacting directors in town. The great French critic Andre Bazin was a tremendous admirer, but I don't think Wyler's stock is quite as high today. Ultimately, I didn't find his story that absorbing, but I wonder if that's because the bio is authorized, or because I feel the same way about most of his work. Over at Instapundit , Glenn Reynolds has this to say about Bill Donohoe: He and I probably disagree on, well, most of the issues he cares about, but way back in when I was on Larry King, he was on in the segment before me and he gave me some good TV sound-bite advice in the green room: Figure out the idea you really want to get across — one sentence, maybe two — and then, at some point, just say it whether it fits where the host is trying to go or not.

That sentence is your payment for going along with the host the rest of the time. This is precisely what I dislike most about TV talking heads. They insist on getting their soundbite in rather than contributing to the discussion. As far as I'm concerned, if they do this regularly, shows should stop inviting them. PS I see Donohoe is up to his old tricks, demanding Penn and Teller be fired because he doesn't like what they're saying. Jonathan Rosenbaum, who regularly mixes politics with film criticism, is up in arms about Quentin Tarantino's latest, Inglourious Basterds.

Agreeing with a Newsweek piece , Rosenbaum feels the film is a revenge fantasy that turns its avenging Jews into the Nazis of the piece. Tarantino's films are often controversial for their violence, which is usually fueled by revenge, but I don't recall any objections before that have been so political. Rosenbaum may have a point. I haven't seen the film, so I can't say.

Even so, I'm guessing it'll be hard to get too excited about the politics of Inglourious Basterds in a world where quite a few people make the obscene comparison of real Jews in Israel to Nazis. Furthermore, Rosenbaum blows his credibility with a silly parting shot at Sarah Palin. So Reader's Digest is filing for bankruptcy. A mainstay in the magazine world for decades, I had no idea it was so deep in debt. It still sells millions, but the trend is down. I've never really read it except in waiting rooms, but I assume the real trouble is not that it's content changed though I hear it has so much as all print is hurting these days. Katharine Hepburn was fairly new to the screen when she won an Oscar for Morning Glory She'd win four overall, but have to wait more than 30 years for her next one.

During the winless period she'd do all her best work. I recently saw Stage Struck , a remake of Morning Glory. The original was a pretty creaky story about Broadway to begin with Hepburn's Stage Door , set in the same milieu, is a much better film , so redoing it 25 years later wasn't much of an idea. Both the original and the remake feature a talented supporting cast, but the whole things lives or dies with its lead, Eva Lovelace, the girl who wants to break into the theatre. The character is both naive and overbearing, and so can easily end up being annoying. Ironically, it requires a true star to play the part of someone who isn't a star. Hepburn was a star and was also a unique individual and it came across.

Susan Strasberg, however, doesn't have it. She comes from a famous theatrical family, but her line readings are so odd that you almost wonder if there's something wrong with her. Best thing about the film is some location shooting on Broadway in the 50s--in color. He's a year-old college student named Firas Alkhateeb. Interesting tidbits: 1 He's from Chicago.

The cop, a year-old, did not know who Dylan was. According to Britain's Daily Mail, Craig Spencer, a "senior officer" with the Long Branch police, told a reporter: 'I'm afraid we all fell about laughing I'm falling about laughing at this rather half-piped quote. Unless, of course, Senior Officer Spencer is London-born. I'm calling the Long Branch police to find out. I don't know. Look at Thin Lizzy's "The Boys Are Back In Town," a very American song released in the 70s: And that time over at Johnny's place Well this chick got up and she slapped Johnny's face Man we just fell about the place If that chick don't want to know, forget her I admit, the "rather" adds to the suspicion.

But I don't find it impossible. Those numbers should continue rising under reform since congressional Democrats are proposing an expansion of Medicaid to help achieve universal coverage. More of the working poor would qualify for Medicaid, and AmeriChoice can sell itself to states as the leading service provider. Hegel commence par une distinction assez obscure dans son langage.

L'objet reste donc dans son autonomie. Mais en fait il se contentait d'exercer la domination et la jouissance. La crainte n'est pas ici un effroi devant la transcendance divine mais bien sa propre fin. C'est la "dissolution", "la fluidification absolue de tout ce qui subsiste". Le Serviteur n'a pas vraiment voulu se soumettre ainsi et il a donc latitude pour changer. Il y a 5 heures. Il y a 6 heures. Telecanter's Receding Rules.

Jeong-Suk's Iron Nail - Drive this rusted iron spike through your flesh and into a living tree and no being can possess you, bewitch you, or even touch you unwanted. It is said Il y a 11 heures. Tales of the Grotesque and Dungeonesque. The woods are a Il y a 23 heures. Andrew Logan Montgomery. Fabled Lands. Vulcanverse extras - Two more Vulcanverse gamebooks are in the layout stage right now and should be available next month. John Jones has kindly prepared a checklist of codewo Il y a 3 jours. Playing at the World. Il y a 5 jours. Il y a 1 semaine. The Alexandrian. Birthday present from the Il y a 3 semaines. Akratic Wizardry.

MERP resurrected? Against the Darkmaster! It was the second game I played regularly a Il y a 4 semaines. Ah, heck. Let's masquerade this Il y a 5 semaines. Bat in the Attic. Just keep in mind that due to how it came a Thoul's Paradise. I was quite satisfied with my article i Mesmerized by sirens. Fantasy paths - Three rarities from Expanding Universe. Jeffs Gameblog. Encounter Critical news?!? Life and Times of a Philippine Gamer.

Il y a 11 mois. Frightful Hobgoblin. Jorune Is A Mental Illness. Remember the Golden Age - PerspectiveI'm sure when the history of Earth is condensed for transport in the Colonial Authority archives to be taken to Jorune, they will talk bout the Hill Cantons. For Honor Age of Ravens. Bestiary of the Fabled Occident - A long time ago I started to put together a bestiary. I've pursued various other projects in the time since but I still have a fair bit of material I'd lik Skein Of Destiny - Tekumel News.

Why does it follow that if a man writes a book that is not like Madame Bovary it is inevitably like Zola? At its best, which it is impossibly often Facts about a christmas carol I mean, come Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water, the greatest sluggers in baseball only make base hits a Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water of their at-bats, Universal Declaration Of Human Rights (UDHR) of the time Bartleby, The Scrivener: An Analysis out, so why should writers, who, I'd argue, rely on Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water harder to use body parts, be expected to hit one out of the ballpark every time they step up to the plate tee hee who ever Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water a sports metaphor would find its way onto this blog? But to sit with you, alone with you, here, in London in this firelit room, you there, I Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water, is all. Over the next few years Edward Kennedy developed a well-deserved reputation in Capitol Hill as a diligent and effective legislator. She takes feminists to task 7 Deadly Sins In Hamlet their attitude toward motherhood and they respond she's mistaken, or she misunderstands them : Morality In Philip Roths Operation Shylock is an opium-den quality to maternity leave. Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water I think it possible that I have got my statues against the sky. I ran Torchbearer - I Character Analysis Of Mary Jo Kopechne In Joyce Carol Oates Black Water Torchbearer this weekend.